Experimenter

JAN 2013

Experimenter is a magazine created by EAA for people who build airplanes. We will report on amateur-built aircraft as well as ultralights and other light aircraft.

Issue link: http://experimenter.epubxp.com/i/101874

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 53 of 55

Hangar Debrief The FAA and some members of the group believed this detail could help manage the abuses of professional builders by making it easier and more reliable to measure the amount of work that a builder could contract with a professional and remain compliant with the 51-percent rule. The ARC soon realized that a grandfathering, or a prior policy plan, needed to be brought into the activities, and it set about devising methods so that folks who had spent years constructing their aircraft would not be regulated out of existence by the imposition of the new rules being put into place. We believe the provisions that were made to accommodate those concerns have been resolved. The new checklist is now in use by the FAA, and the FAA website has numerous listings of popular kit airplanes, along with the evaluations performed by the FAA's National Kit Evaluation Team (NKET). Many of the previously encountered problems became much clearer when viewing a completed evaluation. Before we go any further, it would be good if you take a look at the new checklist here. The New Terms interest in the work that some of these pros were doing that appeared to compromise the major portion rule in FAR 21.191(g), the 51-percent rule, as it has become to be known. Because of the relationship that the FAA, EAA, and industry have, they all got together to resolve the growing concern. We're pleased that they decided to enlist industry and associations, as well as other individuals, to search for a suitable solution. An Aviation Rulemaking Committee (ARC) was formed in 2006, and it completed its work in 2008. The results of the ARC activities were reported to EAA members, and yet more new terms entered our vocabulary. The ARC members proposed a revised checklist. While some members wanted to stay with the old checklist, others believed that adding tasks to the process would provide benefits in that it would allow additional detail and finer division of task assignment. The new checklist also promised to get rid of the dual checks that some FAA representatives were using. We welcomed the committee's proposal for an expanded checklist. The FAA accepted the new checklist with the added tasks, elimination of dual checks, more detail, and the expansion to four columns of items. This was believed by many to be a big improvement. 54 Vol.2 No.1 / January 2013 What are tasks? For this use, "task" is the term used on both the old and new checklists to characterize the work operations and components involved. It was recognized early on that using parts count or time spent would result in larger issues than the term task. The ARC discussed it and recommended its continuation. What is compensation? Paying someone for services, goods, or cash for completing tasks on the list is commercial assistance. What is not commercial assistance? Paying someone to help arrange the shop, set up workstations, or provide tools and training (as long as the training doesn't result in a finished part for the airplane) is not commercial assistance. How does the homebuilder work through this maze? As we said previously, when the FAA interacts with the general public it produces an AC (20-27G in this case), which has plain language and easy to follow flowcharts. The AC also has examples of many concepts involved and is also available on the FAA.gov website here. The 2009 Checklist Job Aid is also available on the FAA website. It's there to guide individuals through the steps and procedures involved with amateurs building aircraft for education or recreational purposes.

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Experimenter - JAN 2013